Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0858820090260020119
Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion
2009 Volume.26 No. 2 p.119 ~ p.133
Assessment of Individual, Organizational, Environmental Capacity for Healthy Cities
Kim Jeong-Min

Koh Kwang-Wook
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to asses individual, organizational and environmental capacity for members of Healthy Cities Partnership (KHCP) and exploring advanced suggestions for further developing.

Methods: Participants were 27. The questionnaire was developed based on Health Promotion Capacity Checklist and it analyze capacity in 3 lelvels including individual, organizational and environmental. Each level is consist of 4 sections, individual: ¡¯Knowledge¡¯, ¡¯Skills¡¯, ¡¯Commitment¡¯ and ¡¯Resources¡¯, organizational; ¡¯Commitment¡¯, ¡¯Culture¡¯, ¡¯Structure¡¯ and ¡¯Resources¡¯, environment:¡¯Public opinion¡¯, ¡¯Political will¡¯, ¡¯Supportive organizations¡¯and ¡¯Ideas and other resources¡¯. Each section was assessed in 4 point rating scale and cross analyzed with basic information.

Results: The mean score of 3 levels were 2.57. Among the 3 levels, ¡¯Individual¡¯ marks 2.78 point which were top and ¡¯Organizational¡¯ marks 2.59 and ¡¯Environmental¡¯ marks 2.33. There were no significant factors affecting Healthy cities capacity of ¡¯Individual¡¯ and ¡¯Organizational¡¯ level, but just ¡¯specialization¡¯ of ¡¯Environmental¡¯ had significance.

Conclusion: Above the results, this study suggested that just ¡¯Individual¡¯ capacity is above median point and other levels were lower. Further efforts for developing Healthy cities capacity, especially focused on ¡¯Organizational¡¯ and ¡¯Environmental¡¯ levels, is strongly required.
KEYWORD
Healthy cities, Capacity building, Socio-ecological Model of Health
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)